Elearning
navigation graphic left

ELearning! Magazine

 

 

MAKING THE INTERNET PARTICIPATORY AND DYNAMIC

 

BY MARK FRYDENBERG  

They use it—but may not know it has a name .Most college students have accounts on Facebook, refer to Wikipedia when writing a research paper, share pictures on Flickr, and make phone calls over Skype. Students and employees use the World Wide Web much differently today than was possible even five years ago, when the Web was primarily a tool for disseminating information.

 

In 2005, Tim O’Reilly, founder of O’Reilly Media, publisher of several software and technology books, coined “Web 2.0” for the ongoing change to a more participatory and dynamic Web experience. To introduce these concepts and their underlying technologies to students, I developed a first-year undergraduate information technology course with the theme “Information Technology Through the Lens ofWeb 2.0.” First offered during fall, 2007 at Bentley College, in Waltham, Mass., the course presented Web 2.0 concepts in a progression that built on previous learning. (See Figure 1.)

 

APPRECIATE

 

A decade ago, Netscape and Mosaic were the two prominent Web browsers, and most Web pages contained hyperlinks to other static documents, Websites and images that took a long time to download over a 56 KB modem. Animated GIFs (graphics files) cycled through individual image frames in sequence to convey animation, and Java applets displayed text in fiery flames. Most home Internet connections were too slow to support the streaming audio or video that we take for granted today.

 

Today, broadband and wireless Internet access are accessible in homes, offices, schools and coffee shops. Today’s computers have multiple processors; memory is cheap; and new formats for compressing audio and video enable their rapid transfer over the Internet. TheWorldWideWeb is used to do business, download entertainment, shop, send messages, meet new people, and make our voices heard.

 

PARTICIPATE

 

Web 2.0 shifts the focus from Websites to Web applications, where content added by one user enriches the value of the application for all users. O’Reilly calls this “harnessing collective intelligence.” Flickr, YouTube, del.icio.us, Google Maps, Blogger, Wikipedia and Facebook are among the genre of interactive applications collectively known as Web 2.0.

 

The Web 2.0 term for this new model is “Software as a Service” (SaaS). Both the application and its data reside “in the cloud” of the Internet and not on the desktop, so they are accessible from virtually anywhere.

 

In a technology course introducing these concepts, students use many Web 2.0 applications throughout the semester. They share ideas on a blog and post class notes on a wiki. They track friends and social circles on Facebook. They vote on popular news articles by “digging” them at digg.com, where the stories that receive the largest number of “diggs” (votes) appear on the site’s front page. Such a process democratizes the Web, as now users can offer their opinions of the day’s top stories or the usefulness of articles on other topics.

 

INVESTIGATE

 

HTML (hypertext markup language) is used to display information on Web pages. However, XML (extensible markup language) is a structured format for sharing videos, photographs, blog posts and news headlines on Websites different from where they originated.

 

Orange RSS icons (really simple syndication) as shown in Figure 2 appear on many Websites to indicate that their content can be broadcast to users interested in subscribing to it. This content is represented internally in XML. After subscribing to an RSS feed from a blog or news site, you can use an aggregator program to check periodically to see if new content has been posted and download if it is found.

 

COMMUNICATE

 

Blogs (short for Web logs) are online journals. Unlike a traditional Web page that requires knowledge of HTML coding in order to post information, updating a blog is as simple as completing an online form. Blogs have become a forum for individual creative expression — and have generated a number of “citizen journalists.” Many bloggers have developed large followings. Blogger.com andWordpress.com are two popular blogging providers.

 

A course blog may augment or replace a traditional course management system. Both teacher and students can post content about a class session, make comments and ask questions. Communication is not limited to the written word. Audio and video podcasts are a useful tool to record course lectures or summarize course concepts. Having students, rather than the teacher, create the media empowers them to not only share their course knowledge, but also master podcasting skills. Apple’s iTunes is a popular aggregator for downloading podcasts and managing the associated multimedia files.

 

COLLABORATE

 

Collaboration is a core capability of Web 2.0. New software tools like Google Docs (docs.google.com) make it possible for people separated geographically to work together in real time over the Internet As is common to most Web 2.0 applications, the documents are centrally stored for access over the Internet. This facilitates team projects, as participants can all edit the same document at the same time rather than e-mailing different versions back and forth. In a simple sense, this mimics the real-world experience of working with team members in remote locations.

 

Students use wikis (hosted at pbwiki. com) to work together during the semester. They sign up for group projects, post and answer each other’s study questions prior to an exam, and share links to interesting Websites. Unlike blogs, a wiki contributor may edit, change or delete another contributor’s entry. All changes are logged, so it is possible to revert back to an earlier version of a wiki page if necessary. Students share in the responsibility of creating and organizing course materials for themselves and their classmates.

 

CREATE

 

Many Web 2.0 applications allow users to create their own organizational schemes by assigning descriptive tags to Web resources. For example, visitors to Flickr.com may upload, organize and search for photographs based on their assigned tags.

 

del.icio.us is a site for book marking favorite Web pages. Tags and related information are stored on a server, making them available on any computer with an Internet connection. Displayed with each tag is the number of people who tagged the same article and links to other articles or Websites containing the same tags. Because people assign them, tags often better indicate the quality or usefulness of a resource than a simple Web search on key words. This approach blends a “folksonomy” with a more traditional taxonomy for organizing resources on the Web. A tag cloud is a popular way to display tags. (See Figure 3).

 

Mashups are at the heart of many Web 2.0 applications that integrate data from different sources or corporate applications. Companies such as Google, eBay and Amazon.com provide application programming interfaces so that others may access their data to use in their own applications. This is usually a task that requires significant programming experience.

 

To combine several concepts presented throughout the semester, students used Microsoft Popfly (www.popfly.com) to create their own mashups. By dragging, dropping and connecting blocks, Popfly makes it easy to mix data from a variety of sources in order to create new applications.

 

Popfly blocks represent ways to access, process, or display information. For example, Figure 4 shows the design of a Facebook Friends Map. First, a Facebook block calls an operation to get a list of Facebook friends. By connecting the Facebook block to the GeoNames block, it is possible to determine the latitude and longitude for each friend’s city and state obtained from Facebook. Finally, by connecting both the GeoNames block and the Facebook block to the Virtual Earth Mapping block, the mashup displays the friend’s name and photo in the appropriate location on the map, as shown in Figure 5.

 

CONCLUSION

 

 “Web 2.0” implies a new milestone in how we have come to use the Internet. The WorldWideWeb’s evolution is the result of advances in both technology infrastructure and in how people embrace technology. The Web has evolved into a platform facilitating new ways of information sharing, collaboration and communication. Teaching Web 2.0 concepts and using its tools in an introductory technology course offers students new ways to interact with their data and their peers as they develop skills that will be valuable to them as future information technology professionals.

 

Mark Frydenberg is a senior lecturer and software specialist in the Computer Information Systems Department at Bentley College in Waltham, Mass., where he teaches an innovative introductory information technology course using Web 2.0 technologies as a tool for learning IT concepts. Frydenberg has published several articles and spoken internationally on teaching with emerging technologies in the college classroom.

 

Bentley College (www.bentley.edu) is a national leader in business education. Centered on education and research in business and related professions, Bentley blends the breadth and technological strength of a university with the values and student focus of a small college. Its undergraduate curriculum combines business study with a strong foundation in the arts and sciences. Offerings at the McCallum Graduate School emphasize the impact of technology on business practice, including M.B.A. and Master of Science programs, Ph.D. programs in accountancy and in business, and selected executive programs. Enrolling approximately 4,000 full-time undergraduate, 250 adult part-time undergraduate and 1,270 graduate students, Bentley is located minutes west of Boston.  

 

 

BY JERRY ROCHE

 

“The e-learning and knowledge segments are lagging some of the other segments in terms of Web 2.0 tools and technology becoming mainstream,” says Joe Lichtenberg, vice president of business development for Eluma, an emerging Web 2.0 developer and marketer. “In the past, a lot of the tools for knowledge management were more structured, rigid and hierarchical than the Web 2.0 technologies, which are just begging for engagement. E-learning enterprises are ripe for reaping the benefits to be gained from Web 2.0 technologies.”

 

Yet enterprises that embraceWeb 2.0 elearning tools should have no difficulty integrating them into the workplace, according to Richard Buck, Eluma’s CEO.

 

“The efficiencies that an enterprise can reap are extremely great,” he notes. “When enterprises find out that users can do it themselves, they can pick up Web 2.0 technologies the next day. They don’t bury it for two years — it just gets done.”

 

Because the domestic economy and workforce are becoming more knowledge based, the market for Web 2.0 applications is enormous.

 

“A couple of dynamics are working to accelerate the rate that organizations are looking at Web 2.0 tools,” says Lichtenberg. “One is that knowledge workers are more pervasive in all industries. Knowledge workers need better, more efficient, more seamless ways to capture their research as an integral part of their daily activities, not as an additional set of steps that will slow them down — especially in a collaborative environment. There’s also been an influx of Gen-Y workers who are used to working with Web 2.0, so bringing those kinds of tools to the workplace is a no-brainer.”

 

WEB 2.0’S FUTURE GROWTH WILL BE IN MORE EFFICIENT TOOLS.

 

 “We’ve been in the Internet space, the knowledge management space and around software for 25 years each, so the daily explosion of Internet technologies and Web 2.0 services is clear to us,” says Lichtenberg. “What strikes us is lack of productivity tools.”

 

Adds Buck: “A huge amount of Web 2.0’s future growth will be in allowing workers to share their normal, everyday work instead of forcing them to become applicreators. That’ll allow Web 2.0 to take a huge step forward.”

 

SECURITY CONCERNS?

 

One possible bump in the road for Websites that employ Web 2.0 technology is security: users are vulnerable to hackers.

 

“Bad guys have developed malicious content to take advantage of some Web 2.0 platforms and infect site visitors with crimeware,” observes Yuval Ben-Itzhak, chief technology officer for Finjan, Inc. “We found hundreds of such malicious cases on MySpace, Yahoo, and all the top-rated sites. And our trend reports indicate even more serious threats in the future.”

 

Historically, “Trojan horse” software has been successful in installing backdoor programs into the computers of unsuspecting users. Today, “Trojan 2.0” programs are even more sophisticated.

 

“The Web 2.0 platform is a very efficient intermediator, so the Trojan doesn’t have to communicate directly to the hacker,” notes Ben-Itzhak. “It can actually place and store malicious commands on a Web 2.0 site. So then the hacker can visit the site periodically and collect the data, remove it from that server, and use it for his or her own benefit. The new Trojans don’t even disclose the hacker’s URL location, so it’s difficult to find and stop multiple offenders.”

 

Ben-Itzhak says that Web 2.0 site owners should inspect uploaded users’ content just before they are about to publish it on their site. This process is very simple and very effective in minimizing or halting infection.

 

Individual users should make certain that their operating systems have the latest security patch from the vendor: Microsoft, Mac, Linux, or any of the others.

 

“Additionally,” Ben Itzhak says, “users can buy security technologies that inspect incoming content in real time to understand whether it’s good or bad.

 

“This type of computer technology does not rely on signatures or URLs like antivirus or URL-filtering programs do. It reads and inspects each individual code on the Web page before it shows on your browser. Although Finjan sells its products to the enterprise market, Finjan’s SecureBrowsing, is a free browser add-on for end-users utilizing the same technology in use by large enterprises. Using Finjan Secure Browsing, what the user sees on the computer screen is a green dot (good content) or red dot (bad content) alongside the URL site.”

 

Reportedly, Web 2.0 security problems will get worse before they get better. As long as the attack methods are successful, and as long as malicious sites are not being blacklisted, hackers will continue to take advantage of them.

 

ED. NOTE: Eluma markets a desktop Web organizer that lets you collect, organize and share any and all of the information you find on the Web. For more information, visit the Website www.beta.eluma.com. Finjan, Inc. provides a free browser plug-in available for downloading that employs the same technology that the company provides to large enterprises. For more information, visit the Website www.finjan.com.  

 

 

 

 

E_mail this article to a friend:

Subscribe Now—to secure your own personal editions

 
Click to Read